The ARC (Amaterasu Dreadnaught and KKM)

Archives for ships and fleets. 'nuff said. Most of the ships here are very very old and will not work in current versions of BSF or SM. You have been warned!

Moderators: th15, Moderators

Better???

Poll ended at Tue Oct 21, 2008 8:43 am

Yes
5
33%
NO!!!!!!!!!!!!!
9
60%
Other (include post)
1
7%
 
Total votes: 15

Shogoll
Lieutenant Commander
Lieutenant Commander
Posts: 64
Joined: Fri Jul 04, 2008 10:08 am

Post by Shogoll »

MC Syndrome, too dark colors, aesthetically displeasing colors, bad repetition, bad section usage, ugly outline, sun reactor is badly made/copied, blue aegis/thrusters are ugly as fuck. This is terrible. Start over, start with smaller ships, start with a better concept.
FIREST0RM000
Captain
Captain
Posts: 486
Joined: Thu Aug 07, 2008 11:32 pm

Post by FIREST0RM000 »

the important part of what I said:
You ignored me, and proceeded onwards, and the rest of the ship is even fucking worse. Seriously, that generator is some sloppy shit, but the rest of the ship is just eye-poppingly bad.

kill it. dispose of it. get rid of it in any way you damned well feel like. super nova, reactor fail, I don't care, but put this ship behind you and start over.

I would have been nicer, but he's right. come up with your own reactor, one that fits in with your style, and if I were you, I'd stop being so stubborn and take some advice. I know you like doing your own thing, but this is just too much epic fail. just take Anna's advice. that's all I have to say.
"any problem can be solved with a gratuitous enough use of high explosives" Normandy
IBurn36360
Commander
Commander
Posts: 171
Joined: Tue Aug 12, 2008 4:18 am
Location: Exact...Unknown
Contact:

Post by IBurn36360 »

Well...It's gone, dead, whatever.

Amaterasu needs to be finished anyway. Pics are in the first post. C&C
Alls Requiem, my current project, with many more to come. Feel free to critique my site as much as you please.
User avatar
DeathsHand
Captain
Captain
Posts: 397
Joined: Sun Feb 17, 2008 1:54 am
Location: Human Resources

Post by DeathsHand »

Ok, I downloaded and toyed around with the Amaterasu ship, and I have determined that your lack of defenses is disturbing.

Using ships balanced to the MRA, it died. Using my cousin's weaker ships, it died. It seems that the larger section 10s and 26s used to fill space actually hamper it's defensive capabilities, as normally many smaller sections used in place of the larger ones can take more damage without causing a critical structure failure. As soon as weapons breach the outline armor, they make short work of the ship. And EVERY root section seems(?) to be parented to that central section twenty six, so when that is destroyed, instead of taking out a chunk, I take out the ENTIRE ship. The weapons are ok, and the wingtip laser cannon are pretty sweet in their appearance, but they really seem to lack any sort of actual kick to them. Though I realize that this isn't balanced to other's fleets, you'd probably want to up the damage, especially if this ship is going to be some sort of flag ship, as it's description suggests.
S͜͟t̷̀̀͟i̷͢ļ̸̕͞l̸̶͞ ̷̢͘͟l̡͟͝u̴̵̸͜͢r̴̸̨k͏͟į̨͜n̛g̸͢͝
IBurn36360
Commander
Commander
Posts: 171
Joined: Tue Aug 12, 2008 4:18 am
Location: Exact...Unknown
Contact:

Post by IBurn36360 »

lol...thanks for the test results, I'm slowly bringing up to MRA. The computer I use to build and test ships is so pathetic that it cann't load Spoot Knight's fleet. :cry:

As for the main and side lasers, their power is going to go up. The active defenses will be provided by a new frigate, which is under testing now. A new version of the Amaterasu will be released soon.
Alls Requiem, my current project, with many more to come. Feel free to critique my site as much as you please.
IBurn36360
Commander
Commander
Posts: 171
Joined: Tue Aug 12, 2008 4:18 am
Location: Exact...Unknown
Contact:

Post by IBurn36360 »

UPDATE:

Amaterasu V2.0 is done, please download and C&C.


Changes:

All weapons do 3X damage
PD's are effective to a degree
Parenting fixed (To a degree, not much I can do without reworking the whole wing)
Alls Requiem, my current project, with many more to come. Feel free to critique my site as much as you please.
FIREST0RM000
Captain
Captain
Posts: 486
Joined: Thu Aug 07, 2008 11:32 pm

Post by FIREST0RM000 »

Changes:

All weapons do 3X damage
PD's are effective to a degree
Parenting fixed (To a degree, not much I can do without reworking the whole wing)
OK, this thing is WEAK. it still struggles to destroy stock ships, and can't even break through a Nagya 3's aegis. it also gets raped by a Vox Vocis. needs armor, and some deflectors wouldn't hurt.
User avatar
DeathsHand
Captain
Captain
Posts: 397
Joined: Sun Feb 17, 2008 1:54 am
Location: Human Resources

Post by DeathsHand »

FIREST0RM000 wrote:
OK, this thing is WEAK. it still struggles to destroy stock ships, and can't even break through a Nagya 3's aegis. it also gets raped by a Vox Vocis. needs armor, and some deflectors wouldn't hurt.
:? Emm, when I toyed around with it, it killed the Nagaya 3 in mere seconds. The invisi-missiles© were a surprise, and provided approximately five seconds of "WTF MY SHIP IMPLODED." However the same armor troubles remain. The outer armor's HP could be manually increased. And the parenting...yeah, still leaves much to be desired, however would require a massive overhaul of the entire ship from what I saw...
S͜͟t̷̀̀͟i̷͢ļ̸̕͞l̸̶͞ ̷̢͘͟l̡͟͝u̴̵̸͜͢r̴̸̨k͏͟į̨͜n̛g̸͢͝
Hades
Commander
Commander
Posts: 174
Joined: Tue Sep 04, 2007 1:19 am
Location: Location: Location: Location: Location: Location:

Post by Hades »

I died a little inside.
Venator
Captain
Captain
Posts: 423
Joined: Sun Feb 10, 2008 12:07 pm

Post by Venator »

Since you included a .sb3, I decided to check the parenting myself:
Image

The main problems are circled (clumsily) below:
Image

Edit:

One bizarre and noteworthy thing: The most powerful weapons (1500 damage Weasels) are pointing... backwards :?.
[url=http://www.wyrdysm.com/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?t=2921][img]http://i30.photobucket.com/albums/c348/DraTuicichNovae/AESig.png[/img][/url]
Caesius
Commander
Commander
Posts: 108
Joined: Sun Oct 12, 2008 3:41 pm

Post by Caesius »

Excuse the n00bery, but what exactly defines good parenting (and more importantly, bad parenting)?

Nobody's complained about mine so I've just kinda assumed I've been doing it right.
[img]http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v195/corporal_esche/sigs/caesius-bsf.png[/img]
FIREST0RM000
Captain
Captain
Posts: 486
Joined: Thu Aug 07, 2008 11:32 pm

Post by FIREST0RM000 »

well, it's bad parenting if you get floating sections. that is just plain unacceptable. this kind isn't as bad. it is OK in that it doesn't leave floating sections, but bad from a tactical perspective, because most of the ships armor gets sheared off, leaving the ship much weaker than it seams at first.

EDIT: I'm kind of disappointed. this is my three hundred fourteenth post. isn't it supposed to say something about pi?
Venator
Captain
Captain
Posts: 423
Joined: Sun Feb 10, 2008 12:07 pm

Post by Venator »

Caesius wrote:Excuse the n00bery, but what exactly defines good parenting (and more importantly, bad parenting)?

Nobody's complained about mine so I've just kinda assumed I've been doing it right.
The problem with the circled area is that it's a tactical liability; the armour on either side of the bow is parented to sections on the same "layer", rather than to a more central point, so hits to the rear of the circled area could tear off the whole bow, rather than just one section.

For a simple visual representation:

Observe a well-parented "ship":
Image

Destroying a single section of the armour has no other repercussions:
Image

Here, look at a badly-parented version of the same ship:
Image

Destroying the same single section tears off all the armour on that side of the ship:
Image
[url=http://www.wyrdysm.com/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?t=2921][img]http://i30.photobucket.com/albums/c348/DraTuicichNovae/AESig.png[/img][/url]
Caesius
Commander
Commander
Posts: 108
Joined: Sun Oct 12, 2008 3:41 pm

Post by Caesius »

Well, I guess I've been doing my parenting alright for the most part, but is that sort of parenting somewhat more acceptable in the case of Schwarzwald?

Image

The idea here is that the parenting of the barrels shouldn't be an issue until the wings and side armor have been blown off.


Edit: Though now that I look at it, I realize I overlooked how everything besides the centerline pieces are connected to those Section 24's at the bases of the engines. I guess it makes sense though, since you'd have to either get a beam pointed almost perfectly down the centerline from behind the ship, or you'd have to get through the engines to get to the 24's.


In any case, I do agree that the Amaterasu's parenting is pretty bad.
[img]http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v195/corporal_esche/sigs/caesius-bsf.png[/img]
Venator
Captain
Captain
Posts: 423
Joined: Sun Feb 10, 2008 12:07 pm

Post by Venator »

Wrong thread for a discussion on someone else's actual ships, Caesius... besides, I can hardly tell given that it's mostly white/light gray.
[url=http://www.wyrdysm.com/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?t=2921][img]http://i30.photobucket.com/albums/c348/DraTuicichNovae/AESig.png[/img][/url]
Locked