WYRDYSM GAMES

He's BRITISH.

can't find my fleet on the fleet judging.

Note the caveat. Kind of.


He also lives in Australia.

[edit:]

Commodore111, you are BLIND. No, seriously. Allow me to quote it:

Thanks, for some reason they didnt show up. The onyl ones that did was the Ixian fleet and the backstory part of the Synaspe fleet. Wierd.

And no I'm not blind, it's not appearing.


EDIT: Must I post an image for you to understand?

Then it should have been obvious that A) the problem was not restricted to your fleet and B) others saw everything fine, so it wasn't an issue of Ara's forgetfulness.

Perhaps something like "The fleets page isn't showing correctly for me, and is missing the majority of the text. Is this issue happening for anyone else?" would have been just a little more accurate.

Your form of lobbying a complaint strikes me as the thought process of a seriously dense person.

Anty and Lizzie are both hereby disqualified, for making a complete clusterfuck out of the thread. Ara's judging is being ignored, because it was submitted more than 24 hours after the deadline, following two extensions, and only loosely follows the judging guidelines.

The totals will be posted up sometime later today. Thank you for your patience.

This thread is one giant shiiiiiitstooooooooooooooorm

It appears that you have to view Aralonia's site with Firefox. Looking at the fleet page with IE only shows the Ixian and part of the Synapse ratings.

I have a site? First I've heard of it.

Fixed.

And no one should be using IE in the first place.

Sorry, was trying to catch up on too many pages at once and mixed up names.

True, just managed to look at my rating. I laughed at the "penisbricks" comment, I just thought that was a funny way of putting the appearance of the designs.

OBJECTION!


Sorry I'm just another IE fan.

It's an old standby term for the description of mine and Arcalane's ships. Yours are... penisbricks with... ...attachments...

I'm sorry that I offended you, and also that you completely misinterpreted my comment. Or the use of the word 'popular', not sure which. To loosely quote SWS, this is a forum based on merit, so whats 'popular' is your definition of whats good, which in this case is based on the judging criteria. And you may not have been reading other judge's comments but I was and several were consistent in their conclusions.

To put it even more simply, several ships which I thought quite good were consistently deemed unsightly or nonfunctional by experts such as yourself. I therefore was thanking the judges for giving me a better idea of what styles work to achieve both quality looks and functional designs, presumably the purpose of the BP. I took away a lot from the comments of all the judges together.

Could have done with a little less attitude though. Yes, a contest with a eventual winner determined by multiple judges is a consensus. It is a popularity contest, but among the qualified experts based on who best met the specified criteria, not the masses talking out their asses. If a vet comes in and builds something passable but far below their known skill, then it is about who built it.

Still, I didn't say any of those things, nor were they my point. Please don't take a single general and innocently worded one sentence comment and come at me with those accusations. I have the utmost respect for all the judges, and you in particular, otherwise I would not have bothered to respond.