Galactic UN In-Camera policy discussions thread

A section for that silly thing called "role play" and other forum games.

Moderators: th15, Moderators

derekiv
Rear Admiral
Rear Admiral
Posts: 861
Joined: Sat Nov 17, 2007 10:00 am
Location: Somewhere

Post by derekiv »

That is a brilliant propasal and Ananke backs it all the way.

Ananke already has ships watching the Coercia border.
derekiv
Rear Admiral
Rear Admiral
Posts: 861
Joined: Sat Nov 17, 2007 10:00 am
Location: Somewhere

Post by derekiv »

People please vote on your position of a disarming barrrage against Coercia military establishments using percision lanclet attacks.
warhammer651
Commander
Commander
Posts: 178
Joined: Thu Dec 13, 2007 8:00 am
Location: i'll giv you a hint. it's somewhere in the vicinity of the third planet from the sun

Post by warhammer651 »

im for the lancet, however, if they have jammers it'll be completely random where they fire, but hey, not our fault then.
if everything's coming your way, you're in the wrong lane.......idiot.
User avatar
goduranus
Captain
Captain
Posts: 455
Joined: Tue Dec 11, 2007 9:09 am

Post by goduranus »

I would be for lancet, but I think we ought to get more reconnasance details on the Coercian fleet before we make our move.

OOC. is the fleet posted yet?
Zeron
Captain
Captain
Posts: 342
Joined: Thu Nov 22, 2007 5:57 am

Post by Zeron »

derekiv wrote:People please vote on your position of a disarming barrrage against Coercia military establishments using percision lanclet attacks.
Absolutly. This is the obviously most peacefull option.

OOC: my empre is the NTO.
Fade-in,fade-out
User avatar
Aralonia
Butt Admiral
Butt Admiral
Posts: 922
Joined: Sun Oct 14, 2007 1:27 am
Location: New Saris, Northern Aralonia
Contact:

Post by Aralonia »

derekiv wrote:That is a brilliant propasal and Ananke backs it all the way.

Ananke already has ships watching the Coercia border.
Several out-of-character remarks:

1.) Borders don't mean anything when Coercia's practically on the other end of a galactic arm from you.

2.) Coercian fleet not finalised in creation yet.

3.) Have fun with your lancet strikes.

4.) Too damn lazy to post in person: "Any sort of strike on Coercian assets will result in assaults on your lot for being the aggressors. If worse comes to worst, Coercia and Aralonia will strike a combined alliance and proceed with total destruction of all fleets, production facilities, and resource locations. All of them. You cannot hide any.
DPUO wrote:<+AirHippo> Funnily enough, folks who abide by the law and try to make something of their lives don't appreciate the rich kids of rich parents getting away with murder and skimming through life.
User avatar
goduranus
Captain
Captain
Posts: 455
Joined: Tue Dec 11, 2007 9:09 am

Post by goduranus »

Due to Coercia's threat being discovered to be a sham, that they have no fleets to back up the threat, UN will now move on to more important issues.

NE establishes "A Robot for every retirement home" initiative, preparing to export medium tech house-keeping robots at a discount to UN states to help increase the quality of life throughout UN by better taking care of the old.

Aditionally, NE puts forward an effort to increase literacy in backwater colonies of UN states through a jointly government funded, mandatory education program for kids.

Edit: dude, Aralonia is suppose to be at war with Coercia. You can't randomly change your RP storyline like that.
User avatar
Aralonia
Butt Admiral
Butt Admiral
Posts: 922
Joined: Sun Oct 14, 2007 1:27 am
Location: New Saris, Northern Aralonia
Contact:

Post by Aralonia »

goduranus wrote:Due to Coercia's threat being discovered to be a sham, that they have no fleets to back up the threat
OOC again.

I'll be blunt, then.

I have final examinations. Constructing Coercian-style ships is more difficult than you think. Considering as well that I just went though a stylechange...

lern2patient
DPUO wrote:<+AirHippo> Funnily enough, folks who abide by the law and try to make something of their lives don't appreciate the rich kids of rich parents getting away with murder and skimming through life.
derekiv
Rear Admiral
Rear Admiral
Posts: 861
Joined: Sat Nov 17, 2007 10:00 am
Location: Somewhere

Post by derekiv »

New Propasal:

Chemical and Bioweapons Ban:
This would mean an end to the use all lethal or disabilitating chemical and bio weapons. This does not me you are not allowed to research and create such weapons, but you can not use them. The inly way this ban can be circumvented is by the unanimous vote of the entire GUN
Tsakara
Captain
Captain
Posts: 496
Joined: Thu Jan 03, 2008 1:25 pm
Location: The desert of the real

Post by Tsakara »

I believe that was stated in my proposal already
User avatar
goduranus
Captain
Captain
Posts: 455
Joined: Tue Dec 11, 2007 9:09 am

Post by goduranus »

@ Tsakara, I don't think UN is yet read to accept your proposal in its entirety. However, NE vote yes for bio and chemical weapons ban
derekiv
Rear Admiral
Rear Admiral
Posts: 861
Joined: Sat Nov 17, 2007 10:00 am
Location: Somewhere

Post by derekiv »

Tsakara wrote:I believe that was stated in my proposal already
Your propasal includes nuclear warheads, which are a major paty of many fleets, including mine. This is the most likely reason for not accepting your proposal.
User avatar
goduranus
Captain
Captain
Posts: 455
Joined: Tue Dec 11, 2007 9:09 am

Post by goduranus »

derekiv wrote:New Propasal:

Chemical and Bioweapons Ban:
This would mean an end to the use all lethal or disabilitating chemical and bio weapons. This does not me you are not allowed to research and create such weapons, but you can not use them. The inly way this ban can be circumvented is by the unanimous vote of the entire GUN
But if anyone wants to start a slaughter there are far better ways...

Hypothetical NEN Siege, at Planet Mariseion.

NEN Admiral: Alright, let's move those asteriods in closer to cover our fleet while we maintain orbit. Launch aircrafts for SEAOD, package battloids for hot dropping.

Tug: Order received. Asteroids holding position.... ah shiiittt, we're taking fire from the ground! Releasing tractor beam!
Last edited by goduranus on Sat Jan 12, 2008 1:45 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Latooni
Rear Admiral
Rear Admiral
Posts: 784
Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2008 1:57 pm
Contact:

Post by Latooni »

derekiv wrote:
Tsakara wrote:I believe that was stated in my proposal already
Your propasal includes nuclear warheads, which are a major paty of many fleets, including mine. This is the most likely reason for not accepting your proposal.
Haha this is awesome, it's just like the real UN! Only pass laws that don't really impact you!
bien4500
Commodore
Commodore
Posts: 613
Joined: Wed Dec 05, 2007 8:07 pm
Location: Here and there

Post by bien4500 »

We vote yes for the Chemical and Nuclear Weapons Ban. Once, 200 years ago, our people were nearly nuked to Oblivion in a Civil War, and we are now staying clear from our homeworld due to the fallout.
Post Reply