Daxx MST - Fleet Beta General Discussion Thread (join now)
Moderators: th15, Moderators
-
- Commodore
- Posts: 515
- Joined: Thu Nov 29, 2007 6:37 am
- Location: Cleveland, Ohio USA
So who would you rather see do it then Kenshin. Chaos or Comus? Or do you have anything to suggest in the way of us deciding who is to build it? And Bad Boy, why not build both using your initial ideas. Then submit them to the team and let us tell ya what we feel is better. And where your strenths lie, in slower more weapon laiden ships, or smaller faster types?
I would suggest the team gives there input on who they would like to see make our mothership. Otherwise if no further vote occurs Chaos will be it.
I'm gonna Step back the deadline to tuesday, once tuesday comes along. I will take into account all votes and make a final desicion. This way we still have a few days to express our thoughts and feelings on the mothership issue. And we then can begin to send that person, our ideas in general. NO matter who builds it Comus or Chaos. All of our ideas will become one on our mothership. If theres any problems with this system please let me know.
I would suggest the team gives there input on who they would like to see make our mothership. Otherwise if no further vote occurs Chaos will be it.
I'm gonna Step back the deadline to tuesday, once tuesday comes along. I will take into account all votes and make a final desicion. This way we still have a few days to express our thoughts and feelings on the mothership issue. And we then can begin to send that person, our ideas in general. NO matter who builds it Comus or Chaos. All of our ideas will become one on our mothership. If theres any problems with this system please let me know.
If it ain't broke, then don't try to fix it
A renegade is only what he makes of himself - Magius to Huma
You have only yourself to blame for failure
A renegade is only what he makes of himself - Magius to Huma
You have only yourself to blame for failure
-
- Rear Admiral
- Posts: 887
- Joined: Fri Sep 28, 2007 11:35 pm
- Location: Below My Postcount
Re: Daxx MST - Fleet Beta General Discussion Thread (join no
Team Beta
1. Comus (PM)
2. Mjolnir (PM)
3. DarkenShroud (PM)
4. ChaosTheory (PM)
5. EndlessInfinity (PM)
6. Himura.Kenshin (PM)
7. Bad Boy (PM)
8. Jafo (PM)
Just to help.
DarkenShroud, ChaosTheory, check your inbox for my ever so quickly done (fifteen minutes FTW) mothership mockup/idea.
1. Comus (PM)
2. Mjolnir (PM)
3. DarkenShroud (PM)
4. ChaosTheory (PM)
5. EndlessInfinity (PM)
6. Himura.Kenshin (PM)
7. Bad Boy (PM)
8. Jafo (PM)
Just to help.
DarkenShroud, ChaosTheory, check your inbox for my ever so quickly done (fifteen minutes FTW) mothership mockup/idea.
Warcraft III (U.S. East) -~-~- [( Aequinox / DACI-Equinox / Equinox]4[Lyfe )]
XBox 360 LIVE (Mostly CoD:WaW) -~-~- [( EquinoxXenom )]
[quote="Wyrdysm Games"][i]Stop quoting the line above in your sigs![/i][/quote]
XBox 360 LIVE (Mostly CoD:WaW) -~-~- [( EquinoxXenom )]
[quote="Wyrdysm Games"][i]Stop quoting the line above in your sigs![/i][/quote]
-
- Commodore
- Posts: 515
- Joined: Thu Nov 29, 2007 6:37 am
- Location: Cleveland, Ohio USA
Ok kenshins idea is very strong, and I suggest we definetly take it into account. But I have sent a few ideas for adjustments to him I would like to see happen, and will send them along as well to those involved.
Edit: I have a differnt idea on a escort. I may send it to the team if it comes out better then the last. Which will be hard to do.
Edit 2 : My write up for kenshins idea has been sent to Chaos and Kenshin for scrutiny. I think my touches are what was needed. Pm me with your thoughts if needed.
Edit: I have a differnt idea on a escort. I may send it to the team if it comes out better then the last. Which will be hard to do.
Edit 2 : My write up for kenshins idea has been sent to Chaos and Kenshin for scrutiny. I think my touches are what was needed. Pm me with your thoughts if needed.
If it ain't broke, then don't try to fix it
A renegade is only what he makes of himself - Magius to Huma
You have only yourself to blame for failure
A renegade is only what he makes of himself - Magius to Huma
You have only yourself to blame for failure
-
- Rear Admiral
- Posts: 887
- Joined: Fri Sep 28, 2007 11:35 pm
- Location: Below My Postcount
Chaos tested it against some PD and it fell down in flames.
Considering that, my next vote for a MS would be [CENSOR] here. It can also be found in your inbox =P.
Considering that, my next vote for a MS would be [CENSOR] here. It can also be found in your inbox =P.
Warcraft III (U.S. East) -~-~- [( Aequinox / DACI-Equinox / Equinox]4[Lyfe )]
XBox 360 LIVE (Mostly CoD:WaW) -~-~- [( EquinoxXenom )]
[quote="Wyrdysm Games"][i]Stop quoting the line above in your sigs![/i][/quote]
XBox 360 LIVE (Mostly CoD:WaW) -~-~- [( EquinoxXenom )]
[quote="Wyrdysm Games"][i]Stop quoting the line above in your sigs![/i][/quote]
-
- Vice Admiral
- Posts: 1372
- Joined: Tue Dec 11, 2007 1:31 pm
- Location: Sunny California
Okay. The "shell" that I have decided upon for the Mothership is now in the inboxes of DarkenShroud, Kenshin, and Comus for review.
Weapons not final! Just a test!
[Edit:] Not to mention that Kenshin's ship is totally illegal by the rules.
Weapons not final! Just a test!
[Edit:] Not to mention that Kenshin's ship is totally illegal by the rules.
[img]http://i307.photobucket.com/albums/nn298/ChaosTheory100/Feather_Signature_Ice3.png[/img]
-
- Rear Admiral
- Posts: 887
- Joined: Fri Sep 28, 2007 11:35 pm
- Location: Below My Postcount
First one or second?
I know the first is over the point limit and doesn't have the minimum speed .
I know the first is over the point limit and doesn't have the minimum speed .
Warcraft III (U.S. East) -~-~- [( Aequinox / DACI-Equinox / Equinox]4[Lyfe )]
XBox 360 LIVE (Mostly CoD:WaW) -~-~- [( EquinoxXenom )]
[quote="Wyrdysm Games"][i]Stop quoting the line above in your sigs![/i][/quote]
XBox 360 LIVE (Mostly CoD:WaW) -~-~- [( EquinoxXenom )]
[quote="Wyrdysm Games"][i]Stop quoting the line above in your sigs![/i][/quote]
-
- Vice Admiral
- Posts: 1372
- Joined: Tue Dec 11, 2007 1:31 pm
- Location: Sunny California
First one breaks . . . let's see . . .Himura.Kenshin wrote:First one or second?
I know the first is over the point limit and doesn't have the minimum speed .
1) the section HP rules
2) the weapon perenting rules
3) the core HP rules
4) the . . . rules . . . yeah . . .
[img]http://i307.photobucket.com/albums/nn298/ChaosTheory100/Feather_Signature_Ice3.png[/img]
-
- Rear Admiral
- Posts: 887
- Joined: Fri Sep 28, 2007 11:35 pm
- Location: Below My Postcount
1) It was a rough draft, and I explicitly said that I didn't put in the actual HP values.ChaosTheory wrote:First one breaks . . . let's see . . .Himura.Kenshin wrote:First one or second?
I know the first is over the point limit and doesn't have the minimum speed .
1) the section HP rules
2) the weapon perenting rules
3) the core HP rules
4) the . . . rules . . . yeah . . .
2) No three weapons or modules are parented to the same section. What then, pray tell, are you talking about?
3) I used the Core HP add point cost. Ya'know, the second option in that entire table? The one underneath the Base Core HP?
4) Congratulations. My respect for you just dropped a couple notches. Thanks for saying I'm stupid without doing your homework and then coming across as stupid yourself. I really appreciate it.
Warcraft III (U.S. East) -~-~- [( Aequinox / DACI-Equinox / Equinox]4[Lyfe )]
XBox 360 LIVE (Mostly CoD:WaW) -~-~- [( EquinoxXenom )]
[quote="Wyrdysm Games"][i]Stop quoting the line above in your sigs![/i][/quote]
XBox 360 LIVE (Mostly CoD:WaW) -~-~- [( EquinoxXenom )]
[quote="Wyrdysm Games"][i]Stop quoting the line above in your sigs![/i][/quote]
-
- Vice Admiral
- Posts: 1372
- Joined: Tue Dec 11, 2007 1:31 pm
- Location: Sunny California
You act like I'm trying to antagonize you. I'm not . . . but I am right on most accounts:Himura.Kenshin wrote: 1) It was a rough draft, and I explicitly said that I didn't put in the actual HP values.
2) No three weapons or modules are parented to the same section. What then, pray tell, are you talking about?
3) I used the Core HP add point cost. Ya'know, the second option in that entire table? The one underneath the Base Core HP?
4) Congratulations. My respect for you just dropped a couple notches. Thanks for saying I'm stupid without doing your homework and then coming across as stupid yourself. I really appreciate it.
I read: "53 Sections (all of them that are outside the aegis) w/ Max HP - 265" I assumed you realized that all of the outside sections have about 3000+ hp, which is not legal, the rules say a max of 5 hp increases per section, starting at 200 hp. (perhaps you meant that if the hp's were put in, that would be the point total for it . . .)
Same thing, I believe, applies to the core, since it doesn't say otherwise anywhere else, and the core on your ship has 5000 hp.
Additionally, as an inarguable point, no weapons/modules may be parented to the aegis'ed sections.
I'm just pointing this out because it makes it very hard to test counter-designs against if all the sections have 3000+ hp. No attack intended.
>_>4) Congratulations. My respect for you just dropped a couple notches. Thanks for saying I'm stupid without doing your homework and then coming across as stupid yourself. I really appreciate it.
*cough*
[img]http://i307.photobucket.com/albums/nn298/ChaosTheory100/Feather_Signature_Ice3.png[/img]
-
- Rear Admiral
- Posts: 887
- Joined: Fri Sep 28, 2007 11:35 pm
- Location: Below My Postcount
1) I never put in the actual HP values. I said this multiple times. They are default. They are that high because I increased the Core HP, and this is what the default section HP is based off of.ChaosTheory wrote: You act like I'm trying to antagonize you. I'm not . . . but I am right on most accounts:
1)I read: "53 Sections (all of them that are outside the aegis) w/ Max HP - 265" I assumed you realized that all of the outside sections have about 3000+ hp, which is not legal, the rules say a max of 5 hp increases per section, starting at 200 hp. (perhaps you meant that if the hp's were put in, that would be the point total for it . . .)
2)Same thing, I believe, applies to the core, since it doesn't say otherwise anywhere else, and the core on your ship has 5000 hp.
4) Additionally, as an inarguable point, no weapons/modules may be parented to the aegis'ed sections.
1) I'm just pointing this out because it makes it very hard to test counter-designs against if all the sections have 3000+ hp. No attack intended.
2) The Core HP has a HP bonus option. I pointed this out to you before, I figure maybe a bolded quote will help you this time. I explicitly said I increased it by 90 points. 90 * 50 = 4500, plus 500 base HP = 5000.
Code: Select all
==Hull Points==
Attribute----|----Frigate----|----Cruiser----|---Battleship--|--Mothership---|
Core HP Base | 300 | 400 | 500 | 500 |
[b]Core HP Add | 1 point/10 | 1 point/25 | 1 point/50 | 1 point/50 |[/b]
Sections | 2 points/1 | 1 points/1 | 1 point/2 | 1 point/2 |
Sec HP Base | 100 | 150 | 200 | 200 |
Sec HP Add | 1 point/150 | 1 point/200 | 1 point/250 | 1 point/250 |
Max Speed | 1 point/0.20 | 1 point/0.15 | 1 point/0.10 | 1 point/0.05 |
Accelerate | 1 point/0.05 | 1 point/0.02 | 1 point/0.01 | 2 points/0.01 |
Turning | 1 point/0.20 | 1 point/0.14 | 1 point/0.08 | 1 point/0.04 |
4) The only thing you have me on is the Aegis and Deflectors parented to the Aegised sections, which just happened to overlook just the same as me in your original "criticism".
Again, I say. Do your homework first. And listen to what I said.
Do you really want me to quote and bold the post I sent you, explaining that I didn't change the section HP?
Warcraft III (U.S. East) -~-~- [( Aequinox / DACI-Equinox / Equinox]4[Lyfe )]
XBox 360 LIVE (Mostly CoD:WaW) -~-~- [( EquinoxXenom )]
[quote="Wyrdysm Games"][i]Stop quoting the line above in your sigs![/i][/quote]
XBox 360 LIVE (Mostly CoD:WaW) -~-~- [( EquinoxXenom )]
[quote="Wyrdysm Games"][i]Stop quoting the line above in your sigs![/i][/quote]
-
- Rear Admiral
- Posts: 887
- Joined: Fri Sep 28, 2007 11:35 pm
- Location: Below My Postcount
There's going to be a lot of frigates. Keep in mind that the ship is pointless if you can never get in range of the enemy, or you're if too slow to face the right direction and it runs circles around you.
Warcraft III (U.S. East) -~-~- [( Aequinox / DACI-Equinox / Equinox]4[Lyfe )]
XBox 360 LIVE (Mostly CoD:WaW) -~-~- [( EquinoxXenom )]
[quote="Wyrdysm Games"][i]Stop quoting the line above in your sigs![/i][/quote]
XBox 360 LIVE (Mostly CoD:WaW) -~-~- [( EquinoxXenom )]
[quote="Wyrdysm Games"][i]Stop quoting the line above in your sigs![/i][/quote]
-
- Commodore
- Posts: 515
- Joined: Thu Nov 29, 2007 6:37 am
- Location: Cleveland, Ohio USA
Hmm so what I wrote up would not be effective. Thats hard to believe. I may have to check into it myself. Looked pretty good to me. I have some other ideas I'll send forth.
If it ain't broke, then don't try to fix it
A renegade is only what he makes of himself - Magius to Huma
You have only yourself to blame for failure
A renegade is only what he makes of himself - Magius to Huma
You have only yourself to blame for failure
-
- Vice Admiral
- Posts: 1372
- Joined: Tue Dec 11, 2007 1:31 pm
- Location: Sunny California
Kenshin . . . forget about it. Arguing isn't going to prove anything in this case. You're just going to screw the thread if you go wild over it. Perhaos you need sleep. Like me . . . I'm going to bed soon.
I'll have a new MS with the other weapon config by Monday.
I'll have a new MS with the other weapon config by Monday.
[img]http://i307.photobucket.com/albums/nn298/ChaosTheory100/Feather_Signature_Ice3.png[/img]