Posted: Tue Feb 19, 2008 9:12 pm
TH15 said it about the v0.86 release, check the main page.Kaelis wrote:Huh? Where did you get that info from?The Boz wrote:So if the game's feature-complete (...)
Wyrdysm Games
This forum has gone [0] days without spambot deletion.
http://www.wyrdysm.com/phpBB3/
Battleships Forever Info | 0.90d released 14 Apr
Page 67 of 77
Posted: Tue Feb 19, 2008 11:12 pm
Check TH15's post on page 64 of this thread (look for the rainbow pictureGiles wrote:TH15 said it about the v0.86 release, check the main page.Kaelis wrote:Huh? Where did you get that info from?The Boz wrote:So if the game's feature-complete (...)
).Posted: Wed Feb 20, 2008 1:06 am
It's better that way so people don't know we're a community eventually doomed to die the slow death of many great games before us.
Posted: Wed Feb 20, 2008 1:12 am
Check yourself, its about shipmaker, not the game.Giles wrote:TH15 said it about the v0.86 release, check the main page.
Browsed through few last pages of this thread, no info on completeness of anything from th15, and no rainbow image for that matter.Jafo wrote:Check TH15's post on page 64 of this thread (look for the rainbow picture
Posted: Wed Feb 20, 2008 1:27 am
Page 65. More features therefore seems unlikely.th15 wrote:You can now create your own encounters involving custom ships and share them around. An encounter is fully self-contained, as the .shp files for the custom ships used in an encounter are embedded into the .enc file itself. This means that it's now easy to share your own custom battles with everyone. Re-enact your favourite space battles in an encounter, dream up whole new conflicts and share them with your friends!
Also new is the new projectile colouring system which allows full re-colouring of bullets, as seen below:[imagesnip]
With this release, Battleships Forever is officially feature complete. There's still some way to go with the content and polish, but all the features that I intend to implement are hereby live.
Posted: Wed Feb 20, 2008 1:32 am
Bah, bastardSiber wrote:Page 65. More features therefore seems unlikely.
Shouldve waited for that image to load
Posted: Thu Feb 21, 2008 1:55 am
Th15, will you be making BF widescreen compatible?
Posted: Thu Feb 21, 2008 1:59 am
Don't widescreen monitors have a 4:3 setting?
Posted: Thu Feb 21, 2008 2:05 am
Most of them do. Your point?Müg wrote:Don't widescreen monitors have a 4:3 setting?
Posted: Thu Feb 21, 2008 2:09 am
1 If it does I don't know about it. so where would one find it?Müg wrote:Don't widescreen monitors have a 4:3 setting?
2 My New Widescreen is DVI, or in other words it's digital. Theres no conversion of the video data or Image when going from the computer to the screen.
Posted: Thu Feb 21, 2008 2:19 am
I've just always wondered if manufacturers were so stupid that they'd not include one, because the crapfuck I've seen on other places when there isn't widescreen support made me think that it was impossible to play without stretching, which seemed silly.Kaelis wrote:Most of them do. Your point?Müg wrote:Don't widescreen monitors have a 4:3 setting?
It's not a reason not to include it; why not use the extra screen real estate if it's there?
Posted: Thu Feb 21, 2008 3:32 am
Uh, what? Im not exactly sure what you're saying, but 4:3 leaves half of screen space empty on widescreen displays. Thats why the 'crapfuck on other places where there isnt widescreen support'.Müg wrote:It's not a reason not to include it; why not use the extra screen real estate if it's there?
Anyway, what does this have to do with TheBlueEcho's request for a widescreen mode?
Posted: Thu Feb 21, 2008 4:08 am
Uh, it has everything to do with it? If you'll look closely, it's a mild endorsement for including such an idea.Kaelis wrote:Anyway, what does this have to do with TheBlueEcho's request for a widescreen mode?Müg wrote:It's not a reason not to include it; why not use the extra screen real estate if it's there?
Posted: Thu Feb 21, 2008 4:09 am
Kaelis Failed UnEpicly to see the meaning in that.
Posted: Thu Feb 21, 2008 5:15 am
Yeah, and i still don't get itTheBlueEcho wrote:Kaelis Failed UnEpicly to see the meaning in that.
