Re: Equestria's Finest
Posted: Fri Jul 12, 2013 1:34 am
My little ponies in space. Science argument.
This is funny.
This is funny.
This forum has gone [0] days without spambot deletion.
http://www.wyrdysm.com/phpBB3/
Cool!Happycake wrote:7). Equation for Alcubierre warp drive: Image This describes the geometry of the warp drive, relative to time, which is constant. Most of the other variables in the equation are factors, meaning that they are substitutes for functions. (aka..Lorentz factor)
Here's a link to the original paper: http://members.shaw.ca/mike.anderton/WarpDrive.pdf
XDHappycake wrote:A working light saber is a self contained plasma lance. In other words, a longer and more efficient plasma cutter. Work it out for yourself.
The fun fact is that most of the most rewarded Sci-Fi stuff use gravitational generator (Babylon 5, Battlestar Galactica, Star Trek, Farscape...)Happycake wrote:A equation/theory for a gravitational generator has not been created at this time. I never even mentioned most of the above mechanisms, even on my own ships. Why are you trying to force the burden of proof on me?
Hey ^^Happycake wrote:You can't change the spin/charge/mass of a gluon
Or inside a anti-strong interaction field targeting specificity the "bound" between atomesHappycake wrote:he strong force binds protons together very tightly; it only breaks at very, very, high temperatures.
I don't add an electron, I take the ones of the two (26 if Iron) who was there before and make sure that it's linked to a single proton (and not having multiple electron around a single proton a other without one -.-)Happycake wrote:By the way, why do have to add an electron?
It's why they use a "cold fusion" system XDHappycake wrote:Any attempts at artificially attaching an electron to an nucleus at a higher temperature will cause it to escape almost immediately.
Single direction field.Happycake wrote:NO. It would take a very, very, very large gravitational field to accelerate massed photons (or any other particle) to a sizable velocity. This is also problematic in execution. You would have to have an ultra-singularity type object moving at an constant acceleration ahead the engine exhaust. Otherwise, the photons would decelerate to their initial velocity after passing the artificial gravity field's center of gravity, possibly even getting stuck in a gravity well,
Happycake wrote:Photon pressure is negligible
Did you read what I write?GATC wrote:(yes, I know, this second amount of trust is ridiculous -.-)
Hey! Let's play a game, it's called find the photon group that belong to a starship in this picture:Happycake wrote:The backscatter from the photons re-hitting your ship would still be easily detectable, through thermal radiation and backscattered particles if not visible light. Where was I? Right...Arming the Railguns....
Yeah! An universe full of magic power! (Excuse me, PSY one XD)Happycake wrote:Read some 40k
Because why not? ^^Necrontyr1998 wrote:GATC, why couldn't you have just gone with some generic spaceship features instead of infringing on the laws of the universe?!?
No, they are in command pod. Some kind of big bubble filled with a nutritive fluid (that can be breathed and ingested).calvin1211 wrote:So the ponies are pretty much permantly wired into their ships then.
Remember a thing, they are not human, and thus, don't always think the same way as us.calvin1211 wrote:And it'd probably be kinda bad for morale.
Except with nanites that can work at the molecular level (BF standard tech (nanomatrix))calvin1211 wrote:(you can't perfectly repair anything),
There's also the nasty implication in this passage that there is a 35 year procurement cycle, which means that tech is likely going to be horribly out of date most of the time since you're getting major gear changes only once every 35 years. You could wind up doing the equivilent of fighting WW2 as Britan with Mark 1s because you decided to wait for the Centurion to be ready and didn't bother with Matildas and Churchills.
By minor, I mean upgrade in term of weapons, shield, software, "light" hardware.GATC wrote:They got minor upgrade through they whole "life"
Indeed ^^Doogie12 wrote:My little ponies in space. Science argument.
This is funny.
Thx!On a less sciency nitpicky front, you shipbuilding is improving.
Also, that is completely wrong:Happycake wrote: ...relative to time, which is constant.
Wait wait wait... What O.OHappycake wrote:Ton is a weight measurement, not a mass unit. It is absolutely meaningless in a place with no gravity.
I'm not an expert in abbreviation, and google say it's "Do not exist"Happycake wrote:Cold fusion=DNE
It's the problem with non native language XDHappycake wrote:The alcubbiere drive does rely on negative energy, which can be "synthesized" in certain conditions. Negative energy has nothing to do with changing the spin/mass/charge of a particle or boson. Ignorance does not allow you to justify claims. I can tell you misunderstood the article due to the fact that you confused the strong and weak nuclear forces with the strong, weak, and dominant energy conditions. The former is rarely (if ever) violated in mainstream physics, while the latter is violated relatively commonly.
Define "advanced" plz?Happycake wrote:An advanced plasma torch
What about Babylon 5 and Star trek?Happycake wrote:I don't really consider 40k sci-fi
The term "quantum mass" is the term used by my metrology teacher in my Engineer school (and who is when not teaching, working for a metrology labs) to define the fact that the photons have an interaction with gravity, and a limited amount of energy on impactThere is no "quantum mass", moron.
XDHappycake wrote:In the name of science...what is wrong with you? Of course you can't detect stray photons using your eye! You have detectors and analytic programs to do it for you. You completely ignored my point...clap...clap
Since when did a Ion engine only eject radiation/light? O.OUgh!!! Ion engine exhausts can collimated to two as I quote "SEVERAL MICROMETERS WITH LITTLE TO NO DISTANCE DISPERSION". It means that someone has to be directly behind my ship to pick up ANY signatures. Charged particles also rarely interact, so you won't get any backscatter (The ONLY way to detect a radiation/light stream).
The fun fact is that when you argue about my photon engine, you use the particle-photon interaction, but ABSOLUTELY not when it's about your ion engine... Does it defy physical law?Happycake wrote:particle-particle
And it is not the case in 99% of the Si-fie tech XDHappycake wrote:Gravity is a omnidirectional vector field, idiot. Mass bends space-time like sheet; you can't make it bend in one direction and remain falt in another. You have to have a moving gravitational field to permanently accelerate an object linearly. Otherwise, your massed photons collect in the gravity well or go into orbit.
Where is the fun in it?STARSTRUCK wrote:give up and use nuclear-electric propulsion like everyone who isn't insane.
Oh good, I thought you were denying Einstein for a second there. Carry on.Happycake wrote:@Necrontyr1998: I should have been more specific...
Uh, no. Mass is a property for all (well, most but that's kinda complicated) objects, measured in grams/kilograms/whatevers. Weight is the calculation, namely that of the force gravity exerts on you (Mass x gravitational acceleration constant a.k.a. g) and thus the proper unit for it should be Newtons. People use kilograms for weight because they're lazy and g on Earth's surface is pretty much constant at 9.81ish so it's pretty easy to calculate mass anyway.Zalausai wrote:Mass is a calculation based on weight and volume. A kilogram is weight while a liter is volume.
Some calculation, too lazy to argue.
Though the kilogram can express mass, it us usually written differently using a cubic number three or something.