![Smile :)](./images/smilies/icon_smile.gif)
![Image](http://i.imgur.com/lukPOwK.png)
Cocel assault variant
![Image](http://i.imgur.com/nUA7qRK.png)
Cocel support variant
![Image](http://i.imgur.com/nIsdWGf.png)
Hesition heavy destroyer
![Image](http://i.imgur.com/ryiQHuq.png)
Bacormil heavy armoured battlecruiser
![Image](http://i.imgur.com/DQ5Ttuv.png)
Oracle class advanced destroyer
![Image](http://i.imgur.com/pfjbujB.png)
No-name ultra old unclassed ship
![Image](http://i.imgur.com/OzZ1O1t.png)
Windvane class civilain cargo ship
Moderators: th15, Moderators
Funny, hose two are the ones I dislike the most. Bacormil looks like a boring triangle with no interesting detail to spice it up, and the unarmed one looks like a trianlge with something attached onto it. A bit of detail, but still just triangle. The other ones are pretty cool, though.Zalausai wrote:The "Bacormil heavy armoured battlecruiser" is the best of these. They could all use some shading. It helps with any ship.
2nd best is "No-name ultra old unclassed ship"
Its class should be frigate or gunship.
BlueScreenOfDeath123 wrote:New ships
Blocky-Block class Block
Corogon strike carrier.
I would agree with the struts - even from a non-aesthetic point of view they are a bit dangerous at best.Netharis wrote:Your shiny ship, on the other hand... Leaves much to be desired.
I find the main problem to be the abrupt transitions between the core and the wing struts, and again from the wing struts to the... wing-thingies.
The transitions should be made to looks smoother; more natural.
Aside from that, the struts could use some beefing up.
They're borderline anorexic as is, and I'm left wondering where the hell they came from seeing as none of your other ships suffer from such a problem (the corgon does a little, but at least those struts are shorter.)