Section removal poll

Archive of old Custom Edition threads.

Moderators: th15, Moderators

TormakSaber
Commodore
Commodore
Posts: 746
Joined: Fri Sep 07, 2007 2:57 am

Post by TormakSaber »

I like most every section. >_>
Grath
Lieutenant Commander
Lieutenant Commander
Posts: 88
Joined: Thu Jan 03, 2008 2:21 am

Post by Grath »

One of these two could stand to be cut without losing much:
51
52
But that's about it.
Lizzie
Admiral
Admiral
Posts: 1685
Joined: Wed Nov 07, 2007 2:03 pm
Contact:

Post by Lizzie »

Grath wrote:One of these two could stand to be cut without losing much:
51
52
But that's about it.
Noooooooooooooo I use those way too much. D:
Image
Master Chief
Vice Admiral
Vice Admiral
Posts: 1235
Joined: Wed Jan 02, 2008 4:27 pm
Location: Elysium

Post by Master Chief »

27
28
29 (bleh, three huge chunks with terrible aesthetic value)
33 (wtf is this for, use 70)
57 (ugly)
[b]GONE UNTIL FURTHER NOTICE[/b]
User avatar
Anna
The artist formerly known as SilverWingedSeraph
Posts: 3447
Joined: Wed Sep 26, 2007 8:51 pm
Location: Elsewhere

Post by Anna »

Image

27, 28 and 29 have uses. :| Removal of them will make me quite unhappy.
Founder and Event Coordinator for the BSF Beauty Pageant. Founder of the Pseudo-Chainship Project. Admin. Games Master.
Quality Control Enforcer
Gay cute girl and fucking proud of it.
Grath
Lieutenant Commander
Lieutenant Commander
Posts: 88
Joined: Thu Jan 03, 2008 2:21 am

Post by Grath »

How about this
By now, it's too late to remove sections.

Edit:
Also, Lizzie, I said 'One of these two could be removed'. They're the 2/3 nearly-interchangeable sections of BSFCE.
Exethalion
Vice Admiral
Vice Admiral
Posts: 1033
Joined: Tue Nov 13, 2007 6:36 pm
Location: Stuttgart, DE
Contact:

Post by Exethalion »

38
42
Last edited by Exethalion on Sun Oct 12, 2008 7:32 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Arcalane
Pseudofeline Overlord
Posts: 4034
Joined: Thu Sep 13, 2007 10:37 am
Location: UK

Post by Arcalane »

Exe, you're a goddamn idiot.

31 is a standard core armour plate.

33 is used to connect 32 to 34 for extendable-length hydraulics.

38 is by far the ugliest aerial, not 39.

What did 42 ever do to you? :|
  /l、
゙(゚、 。 7
 l、゙ ~ヽ
 じしf_, )ノ
Exethalion
Vice Admiral
Vice Admiral
Posts: 1033
Joined: Tue Nov 13, 2007 6:36 pm
Location: Stuttgart, DE
Contact:

Post by Exethalion »

Okay okay, sorry, posted with a hangover and triple failed, I meant 38 was the ugliest aerial, got mixed up, and I didn't realise the whole hydraulic thing till you told me, and I failed to see that the core fits nicely in 31. :|

But I stand by 42. :P

Edit: GODDAMN IT, NINJAS ALL ROUND, SAVE ME SUDAFED, SAVE ME
Last edited by Exethalion on Sun Oct 12, 2008 7:35 pm, edited 2 times in total.
User avatar
Anna
The artist formerly known as SilverWingedSeraph
Posts: 3447
Joined: Wed Sep 26, 2007 8:51 pm
Location: Elsewhere

Post by Anna »

31 (needs improvement to blend with megatach better)
Megatach? What? What does Section 31 have to do with Megatachs? o_O This is what Section 31 is for:
Image
33 (utterly useless)
34
While I agree that 33 isn't particularly useful, since we have section 70, section 34 is part of the 32-33-34 chain. :|
Image
39 (ugliest aerial section, 2 is more than enough)
I disagree. I personally think section 38 is far worse and has less uses.
42
And while I may personally find this section useless, people like Arcalane do not... :? And this is why I hate the entire concept of removing sections from BSF:CE. Because everyone loses, that way. If it had been said from the start that the sections were just trial sections and that some would be stripped away be "popular vote", that would have been a different matter, but eh...

EDIT: Damnit. Beaten by Arca. Fuck. And Exe! Damnit!
Founder and Event Coordinator for the BSF Beauty Pageant. Founder of the Pseudo-Chainship Project. Admin. Games Master.
Quality Control Enforcer
Gay cute girl and fucking proud of it.
TormakSaber
Commodore
Commodore
Posts: 746
Joined: Fri Sep 07, 2007 2:57 am

Post by TormakSaber »

And this is why I hate the entire concept of removing sections from BSF:CE. Because everyone loses, that way. If it had been said from the start that the sections were just trial sections and that some would be stripped away be "popular vote", that would have been a different matter, but eh.
Yus, I agree. It's always harder to trim down than it is to add to it.
Cycerin
Captain
Captain
Posts: 395
Joined: Fri Nov 09, 2007 3:13 am

Post by Cycerin »

Don't want any of them to go, tbh.
Master Chief
Vice Admiral
Vice Admiral
Posts: 1235
Joined: Wed Jan 02, 2008 4:27 pm
Location: Elysium

Post by Master Chief »

Agreed. Personally though it wouldn't hurt to remove some of the sections, it wouldn't benefit either. Might as well leave them as they are. We'll all find uses for them I'm sure.
[b]GONE UNTIL FURTHER NOTICE[/b]
Kanosint
Commander
Commander
Posts: 187
Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2008 9:04 am

Post by Kanosint »

I do think 33 is useless, it's 2 70s... If you just rename 70 to 33, it's all good...
BoVinE
Commodore
Commodore
Posts: 603
Joined: Fri Jan 18, 2008 2:37 am

Post by BoVinE »

The problem I have with 33 is that it;s an extremely constrained part, useful in basically one situation.
Forgetting internet deadlines since 2003
Locked