Page 2 of 2

Re: Ratai vs The Segregation Warband

Posted: Sat Mar 16, 2013 12:00 am
by R0ni
( ^ u^) Muuuhahah.. MUUUAHAHAH.. ( o. o) Yeah... Ratai unfortunately cannot place very large fleet this backwater sector especially with ships demanded elsewhere, so its actually propably going to be bit less than 80. ~60 relatively small ships. But if the muffins got their god damn muble bubble shield station, Imma plant blockade platform with hyperspace inhibitor over the jump node. RAWR!

Re: Ratai vs The Segregation Warband

Posted: Sat Mar 16, 2013 4:24 am
by R0ni
My fleet will have relatively light ships as this operation does not recieve same priority as the other fronts do.. I guess Ratai are still viewing Segregation warpand as mere pirates and nothing else. And since we are now in system, is it okay I can launch squadron of fighters into battle even if carrier is not present?


Total number of ships: 56
1x White star battlecarrier (command ship)
4x Guardian hvy cruiser.
6x Stormbringer missile cruiser.
4x Dragonfly light cruiser.
4x Mover (civilian light cruiser - armoured freighter)
2x Besieger light cruiser (surprise! Its an siege platform.)
10x Angel class destroyer.
5x Teus class destroyer.
10x Hammerhead mk2 Frigates.
10x Hammerhead mk1 Frigates.

Also, once the blockade at the jump node has been established.
1x Ratai blockade platform.
6x Sentry guns.
1x Supply ship. (To perform small repairs)

Are these acceptable?

Re: Ratai vs The Segregation Warband

Posted: Sat Mar 16, 2013 9:09 am
by TehPlazmon
Hehehehehehehehehehehehehehehe this sounds fun. >;3

Re: Ratai vs The Segregation Warband

Posted: Sat Mar 16, 2013 4:09 pm
by R0ni
Will you place the jump node blockade, so that I can start invading the system? (o. O)~
Or shall I place my attacking shippies first?

Re: Ratai vs The Segregation Warband

Posted: Sat Mar 16, 2013 9:59 pm
by TehPlazmon
You're the one who owns the node blockade! o(>_<)o Your turn first me thinks. :P Or it'd be a little unfair with me converging all on you in the middle......

Re: Ratai vs The Segregation Warband

Posted: Sat Mar 16, 2013 10:48 pm
by R0ni
( o. o)? Ooh, so there are no SG ships at the jump node yet? Or? I mean, Ratai ships gotta jump into the system after all and then plant the blockade right dere. After the freighters were destroyed, only single Ratai ship remains in the system which is the angel class destroyer, flying very close to the sun to hide its signature - monitoring the jump node from there.

( o. o)o Of course, if you prefer that Ratai fleet makes it to the system before SG, that can do as well, in which case, it would be Ratai blockade SG would have to run through.

Just fot the functionality of the game, the first option would be better.

Re: Ratai vs The Segregation Warband

Posted: Sun Mar 17, 2013 11:11 am
by TehPlazmon
Ran all the ships (yeah, all 133 of them) in an encounter..... almost even battle. :P asside from me having more numbaz. +_+

Re: Ratai vs The Segregation Warband

Posted: Sun Mar 17, 2013 3:38 pm
by R0ni
Wow, my comp would not be able to do that... I think... Im uploading new ship pack today and then making the .enc file. ( o uo)

Re: Ratai vs The Segregation Warband

Posted: Mon Mar 18, 2013 12:26 am
by R0ni
Alrighty, I have now made the .ecn file. I hope this is smexy enough, with Ratai ships jumping in one after the other. Place your ships as you like.

I have set the ships come in with following pattern.
-First comes in squadron of fighters and bombers.
-Then jumps in some frigates, with cruiser escort.
-After short moment, main force jumps in, with more cruisers, destroyers and besieger light cruiser.
-If this wave somehow fails, then after it all has been destroyed, one White star and 2 Stormbringers jumps into mop up the remaining enemy.. hopefully.

I will not make the full fleet jump in because it would be too laggy (and too greatly overpowering your ships guarding the node) This way you might have chance to pick some of my ships before your blockading ships get destroyed. :D Total number of ships is about 30. Need to count though ( >_>).

Anyway.. Ecnounter file is here:
Incoming fleet.zip
(10.56 KiB) Downloaded 393 times
REMEMBER TO DOWNLOAD THE NEWEST RATAI SHIPSIES!
( ^ u^)o Happy muffin around!

Re: Ratai vs The Segregation Warband

Posted: Mon Mar 18, 2013 7:28 am
by TehPlazmon
Hang on. >_< What are you sending where? Fleet movements mang!!!

Re: Ratai vs The Segregation Warband

Posted: Mon Mar 18, 2013 5:45 pm
by R0ni
( o. o)/ My entire fleet jumping from Rirya to Scot. Of course, I did not put all my ships there cause it would had just been mega super muper laggy. ( >n <) I would count the ships, but I can't anymore. BSF won't start for me anymoar so I gotta download it once I am back home and see..

Re: Ratai vs The Segregation Warband

Posted: Mon Mar 18, 2013 11:48 pm
by Necrontyr1998
R0ni, I couldn't help but notice that you said cruisers are escorting frigates. Isn't that normal the other way around?

Re: Ratai vs The Segregation Warband

Posted: Tue Mar 19, 2013 12:20 am
by R0ni
Well, yeah. Normally cruisers do not escort smaller craft. I think better word would had been aided or... something like that. Its just few cruisers providing some firepowah for the otherwise weaklish frigate assault.

Edit: Now re-downloaded the BSF and counted the ships.


First wave (roughly in order in which the ships will jump in:
3x FF11 Interceptors.
5x FF34D bombers.
5x Hammerhead MK2 Frigates.
2x Guardian Hvy Cruisers.
1x Stormbringer Missile cruiser.
4x Teus Class destroyers.
1x Mover class Heavy freighter (Light cruiser)
1x Besieger Artielly cruiser.
1x Dragonfly light cruiser.

IF all of these ships get destroyed:
2nd Wave
1x White star battlecarrier.
2x Stormbringer Missile cruiser.

Re: Ratai vs The Segregation Warband

Posted: Tue Mar 19, 2013 3:29 am
by TehPlazmon
Mmm ok sweet. :3 I'll add my stuff to the enc tonight. The ships that are basically flying around the system will be warping in, having noticed a fleet on the move and being closest to the node.

EDIT: Ok uhm. I've got exams coming up so I'll be pretty inactive... Sorry. :( We might have to put this on hold a little.