Posted: Sun Dec 06, 2009 1:13 pm
Less generic...?
Wyrdysm Games
This forum has gone [0] days without spambot deletion.
http://www.wyrdysm.com/phpBB3/
~Archalieus Shipyards~ - Rusty
Page 8 of 19
Posted: Sun Dec 06, 2009 1:46 pm
Still generic, but a different type of generic. cool looking ship(s) that haven't had their like shown before I think, cool use of large detail, and non-symmetrical pieces. Nice glows, its a solid looking ship and is really well done, Congrats.
Posted: Mon Dec 07, 2009 2:22 am
Too big to be "generic" IMO, and everyone in the room went "Ooooh pretty" when I pulled it up. I love that fire color of the glows, and the hull work is good too, even if it's nearly opposite my design aesthetic. Keep rolling with this! 
Posted: Wed Dec 09, 2009 1:23 pm
The Ancardia kinda sucked out all my creativity after finishing it 
...
Half decent thing i've come up so far. Late WIP.
...Half decent thing i've come up so far. Late WIP.
Posted: Wed Dec 09, 2009 2:46 pm
Hmm...I'm thinking that these (or rather, this one, as now I'm suspecting its another transforming thing) should have more hard angles and less rounded edges so it looks like its part of the same fleet as the bigger one.
Regardless, the top one looks much better than the bottom one.
Regardless, the top one looks much better than the bottom one.
Posted: Thu Dec 10, 2009 10:35 am
Arise, Baraci!
C&C is always welcome....
C&C is always welcome....
Posted: Fri Dec 11, 2009 6:16 am
Anyone out there 
?
WIP.
?WIP.
Posted: Fri Dec 11, 2009 6:39 am
That is a neat carrier looking thing, but where is its engines?
The back looks really empty.
The back looks really empty.
Posted: Fri Dec 11, 2009 7:09 am
Section work is pretty good, except at the back edges.
The front looks cut off to me and I think the side pods should be a little bigger. But that's just an opinion
The front looks cut off to me and I think the side pods should be a little bigger. But that's just an opinion
Posted: Fri Dec 11, 2009 7:22 am
LactoseTolerant wrote:WIP.
Engines always go on last for me.
Oh hay, 2 more fighter bays.
Posted: Fri Dec 11, 2009 8:06 am
It's a bit generic and uniform. make it a bit more depthed.
Posted: Mon Dec 14, 2009 2:20 am
WIP
Posted: Mon Dec 14, 2009 3:28 am
Nice and industrial. 
Posted: Mon Dec 14, 2009 8:01 am
OMG the orange it burns!!
No seriously, that carrier is looking really good, the colors all work, and as Droid noted it does look very industrial, but more modern industrial than anything.
It does however look fat. to my mind it needs to be longer, and also it needs more places to "store" fighters in, as this thing has 3 or 5 runways it would need to have space for at least 50 or so fighters.
But great work so far can't wait to see the finished product.
No seriously, that carrier is looking really good, the colors all work, and as Droid noted it does look very industrial, but more modern industrial than anything.
It does however look fat. to my mind it needs to be longer, and also it needs more places to "store" fighters in, as this thing has 3 or 5 runways it would need to have space for at least 50 or so fighters.
But great work so far can't wait to see the finished product.
Posted: Mon Dec 14, 2009 8:33 am
It's starting to get a bit out of hand as I intend it to look like this:
With smaller fighter bays/fuel tanks studded on the arms.
And some "transport relays" connecting the various parts of the outer arms.
With smaller fighter bays/fuel tanks studded on the arms.
And some "transport relays" connecting the various parts of the outer arms.