My attempts at shipmaking

Archives for ships and fleets. 'nuff said. Most of the ships here are very very old and will not work in current versions of BSF or SM. You have been warned!

Moderators: th15, Moderators

Zater
Commander
Commander
Posts: 143
Joined: Tue Jan 01, 2008 5:01 am

Post by Zater »

So, nothing?
This year, or this month, or, more likely, this very day, we have failed to practise ourselves the kind of behaviour we expect from other people. - C.S. Lewis
Pvt_Joker
Lieutenant, Junior Grade
Lieutenant, Junior Grade
Posts: 12
Joined: Sat Feb 02, 2008 2:36 am

Post by Pvt_Joker »

Im pretty new to ship making myself but they look quite good, parenting seems fine, i like generic ships so thumbs up from me, take a look at my thread and post lemme know what you think of mine
Zater
Commander
Commander
Posts: 143
Joined: Tue Jan 01, 2008 5:01 am

Post by Zater »

And now, yet another ship!

http://www.wyrdysm.com/battleshipsforev ... Spiker.sb3

Image

The Spiker
This year, or this month, or, more likely, this very day, we have failed to practise ourselves the kind of behaviour we expect from other people. - C.S. Lewis
Zater
Commander
Commander
Posts: 143
Joined: Tue Jan 01, 2008 5:01 am

Post by Zater »

...I think i set the Aaker's blaster RoF too high, and maybe a bit too low for the Spiker.
This year, or this month, or, more likely, this very day, we have failed to practise ourselves the kind of behaviour we expect from other people. - C.S. Lewis
Zater
Commander
Commander
Posts: 143
Joined: Tue Jan 01, 2008 5:01 am

Post by Zater »

...
This year, or this month, or, more likely, this very day, we have failed to practise ourselves the kind of behaviour we expect from other people. - C.S. Lewis
Exethalion
Vice Admiral
Vice Admiral
Posts: 1033
Joined: Tue Nov 13, 2007 6:36 pm
Location: Stuttgart, DE
Contact:

Post by Exethalion »

Zater wrote:...
No offence to yourself, but people do not have to post here if they do not wish to. My thread is always updated, yet there never seems to be any serious comments. I'm fine with that.

I'd advise saving ships and releasing them in bunches rather than one at a time, to attract more attention. And perhaps name the thread "Zater's ships updated xx/xx/08" like Seraph. Maybe put a link in your sig.

But don't force people to post, or make unneccesary bumps.

BTW, the Spiker's arms seem redundant. I'd put scatter beams on them if I were you.
Zater
Commander
Commander
Posts: 143
Joined: Tue Jan 01, 2008 5:01 am

Post by Zater »

Exethalion wrote:
Zater wrote:...
No offence to yourself, but people do not have to post here if they do not wish to. My thread is always updated, yet there never seems to be any serious comments. I'm fine with that.

I'd advise saving ships and releasing them in bunches rather than one at a time, to attract more attention. And perhaps name the thread "Zater's ships updated xx/xx/08" like Seraph. Maybe put a link in your sig.

But don't force people to post, or make unneccesary bumps.

BTW, the Spiker's arms seem redundant. I'd put scatter beams on them if I were you.
So, should I bunch up the current ships?

Also, the arms are there for aesthetic(I was hoping to make them longer and to look less stubby)

The altered version with scatter beams

Image
This year, or this month, or, more likely, this very day, we have failed to practise ourselves the kind of behaviour we expect from other people. - C.S. Lewis
Exethalion
Vice Admiral
Vice Admiral
Posts: 1033
Joined: Tue Nov 13, 2007 6:36 pm
Location: Stuttgart, DE
Contact:

Post by Exethalion »

Zater wrote: So, should I bunch up the current ships?
No, just wait until you've built a few new ones then release them in one go.

I'm afraid to say though, unless you can build fantastically artistic ships like Seraph, or nice asymmetrical ones, or just bloody gigantic monsters, they aren't going to get much attention. :(
Locked