The Chain Ship Project

Archives for ships and fleets. 'nuff said. Most of the ships here are very very old and will not work in current versions of BSF or SM. You have been warned!

Moderators: th15, Moderators

Locked
User avatar
Verminator
Captain
Captain
Posts: 390
Joined: Sat Apr 26, 2008 5:17 pm
Location: Warringtonia, Englandland

Post by Verminator »

The ship's looking great now. I'm looking forward to seeing it finished and coloured.

Maybe everyone who contributed should chip in with an idea for a name, and then we can have a vote on what it can be called. Of course, you wouldn't be able to vote for the name you gave. Good idea?
I have to kill fast and bullets are [i]too slow.[/i]
TheBlueEcho
Vice Admiral
Vice Admiral
Posts: 1435
Joined: Tue Dec 04, 2007 7:31 am

Post by TheBlueEcho »

I like that Idea.
As for a name... I had a few Idea's... But I forgot them. :) So I'm just going to go with Syrus.

But what about Backstory, do you think it needs one?
User avatar
Verminator
Captain
Captain
Posts: 390
Joined: Sat Apr 26, 2008 5:17 pm
Location: Warringtonia, Englandland

Post by Verminator »

I don't think it needs one, but it would be a nice touch. As for a name, I'm going to go with Alliance. Kinda touches on how it's being built.
I have to kill fast and bullets are [i]too slow.[/i]
Raul
Captain
Captain
Posts: 314
Joined: Sun Apr 20, 2008 5:17 am

Post by Raul »

Babel is my vote.

We should write each of our names really small on the hull once we are done, like they do on prototype vehicles...

Ok I need opinions here. In picture A I tried not to change anything structural except for removing forgotten pieces and smoothing edges. Added some turrets, effects, etc.
In picture B, I was struck by a minor dislike of the engine placement, so I fooled with things... Its still messy cuz I just groupmoved stuff so I'm just talking about the basic placement.

I don't care if people say the change is horrible, I'm more than happy to discard that version, but I figured I should check rather than submit something I'm not happy with, or drastically change someone's work without permission.
Image

Image
Spoot Knight
Rear Admiral
Rear Admiral
Posts: 839
Joined: Sun Jan 27, 2008 2:59 pm
Location: In the Vega star system, monitoring UCM defense movement.
Contact:

Post by Spoot Knight »

I say stick with the first one.
The United Commonwealth Military and Spootech Industries joint fleet.
[img]http://i97.photobucket.com/albums/l223/SpootKnight/Spootech/av-1.gif[/img]

[url=http://www.wyrdysm.com/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?t=1854]Spootech Industries - The Third Revision, upgrading to the Fourth Revision.[/url]

[url=http://www.wyrdysm.com/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?t=2273]How Spootech Industries came to be as it is now; the history of Spootech Industries ship making.[/url]
TheBlueEcho
Vice Admiral
Vice Admiral
Posts: 1435
Joined: Tue Dec 04, 2007 7:31 am

Post by TheBlueEcho »

Got something better now: Consortium is my bid.

@ Raul: I have things I like about both of them. But I'll go with A as well. However you think maybe you can lop off them Little Baby Thrusters in the front and put something nicer? I don't like them personally.
User avatar
Arcalane
Pseudofeline Overlord
Posts: 4034
Joined: Thu Sep 13, 2007 10:37 am
Location: UK

Post by Arcalane »

Spoot Knight wrote:I say stick with the first one.
QFT.
  /l、
゙(゚、 。 7
 l、゙ ~ヽ
 じしf_, )ノ
antisocialmunky
Vice Admiral
Vice Admiral
Posts: 1032
Joined: Wed Jan 30, 2008 8:22 am

Post by antisocialmunky »

The right half really looks alot like a Battlestar.
Don’t worry it has airbags.
Alreadyunder
Lieutenant Commander
Lieutenant Commander
Posts: 68
Joined: Sat Nov 24, 2007 10:36 pm

Post by Alreadyunder »

I would have thought that the two parts at the front/sides that are currently engines would make a great pair of places for a main weapon system of some sort. It seems to have enough engines already.

Just an outsiders viewpoint :)
ChaosTheory
Vice Admiral
Vice Admiral
Posts: 1372
Joined: Tue Dec 11, 2007 1:31 pm
Location: Sunny California

Post by ChaosTheory »

The current loadout of weapons seems very . . . uncoordinated and unrealistic. Who sticks more Blasters on the engines than the ship body? And Demeters on the tips of engines? Oi vey, people.
[img]http://i307.photobucket.com/albums/nn298/ChaosTheory100/Feather_Signature_Ice3.png[/img]
Raul
Captain
Captain
Posts: 314
Joined: Sun Apr 20, 2008 5:17 am

Post by Raul »

I agree about the engines, and I made the forward ones the way I did for weapons potential. CT, those aren't dementors, at least they don't fire. I was going for the turret look I saw in Talhydras's thread.LIES, it was sibers! Look closely and you will see they are the plasma charges already put there by someone else.

I like Consortium.

I agree about the blasters, but those pieces do make natural turrets.

@TBE, I will do my best, but my natural inclination is to make a ship streamlined, so does anyone care if I go with version A, but strip off the outer engines and work on a better thruster? May have to leave some of this to the next people cuz I'm not great with engines... If not I can leave them the way they are, finish a few other spots, and post it tonight for the next person.
Commodore111
Commodore
Commodore
Posts: 684
Joined: Sat Jan 26, 2008 12:06 pm

Post by Commodore111 »

Man, people just don't get that it's a ****in' DEMETER! NOT A DEMENTOR!
BoVinE
Commodore
Commodore
Posts: 603
Joined: Fri Jan 18, 2008 2:37 am

Post by BoVinE »

Commodore111 wrote:Man, people just don't get that it's a ****in' DEMETER! NOT A DEMENTOR!

*sucks out soul
BoVinE
Commodore
Commodore
Posts: 603
Joined: Fri Jan 18, 2008 2:37 am

Post by BoVinE »

Sorry, why are we doing weapons already? I'd assume that doodads and hull touch up need to go first.
User avatar
Arcalane
Pseudofeline Overlord
Posts: 4034
Joined: Thu Sep 13, 2007 10:37 am
Location: UK

Post by Arcalane »

Also;

What happened to mah damn waste packaging and ejection system?

Demeters look kinda naff as turrets, at least in this case. Any kind of covering-up-with-another-turret generally looks bad. Only exceptions I've found were beamers and railguns.

Secondly;

What is with that utterly useless aegis on the front of the engines? It doesn't seem to serve an aesthetic purpose since it's barely visible, nevermind a functional purpose.
  /l、
゙(゚、 。 7
 l、゙ ~ヽ
 じしf_, )ノ
Locked