Opinions on my ship

Kiltric · Post by **Kiltric** » Tue Apr 21, 2009 3:14 am

Just wanted some feedback on this before I started arming it. Let me know.

EDIT: reworked it, much less repetition. Any more thoughts?

Nutcase · Post by **Nutcase** » Tue Apr 21, 2009 3:18 am

Reminds me of those ancient ships that were built when there were only stock sections available.
I don't think that's a good thing.

Magick · Post by **Magick** » Tue Apr 21, 2009 3:31 am

Nutcase wrote:Reminds me of those ancient ships that were built when there were only stock sections available.
I don't think that's a good thing.

Indeed. I think it has something to do with the repetition/section size.

Swamp Fox · Post by **Swamp Fox** » Tue Apr 21, 2009 3:34 am

Nutcase wrote:Reminds me of those ancient ships that were built when there were only stock sections available.

That in and of itself isn't necessarily a bad thing. Many of the old ships were quite good. This one, however, has one extremely prominent flaw: repetition. Instead of tiling the one piece over and over and over and over and ov.... try to use different combinations to achieve the same shape and any interior designs. As it is now, the shape is nice, but the construction leaves much to be desired.

Slayer0019 · Post by **Slayer0019** » Tue Apr 21, 2009 4:08 am

WHOA PART REPETITION.
You may have noticed, we now have well over 100 sections to work with. Spamming those triangles (and god forbid the 22's) is not a pretty sight. Try again.

Nutcase · Post by **Nutcase** » Tue Apr 21, 2009 4:10 am

It wouldn't be that bad if those wings weren't the first thing you see.

Kiltric · Post by **Kiltric** » Tue Apr 21, 2009 8:36 am

*bump* edited.

DAikum · Post by **DAikum** » Tue Apr 21, 2009 8:42 am

Much better, still some repetition on small sections but still looks good.

Sponge · Post by **Sponge** » Tue Apr 21, 2009 9:55 am

If there's one thing that's as bad as repetition, it's stretching the hell out of sections. All you've done is traded one evil for another.