Wyrdysm Games

Ignore madcommander. Problems: -Ugly shape -not-too-good/too-bad concept. -ugly ship -Detail contrast -Looks extremely cluttery -fugly ass tail -red turtle -looks more like an orbital station that was designed by someone who forgot to take their pills this morning. -fugly colors(washed out pink + gr...

Could part of the 'clutter' be that he made the struts fold into the main body, thus the sections aren't meant to fit together well? I'll grant that the barrel could be more creative but we've had this discussion before and a barrel isn't meant to do much besides fling shit at you. 1)Yeah, that cou...

I can't be truthful? When did that rule get approved?

The ship is basically a giant rock of clutter with two flimsy, long struts sticking out.

o____o where did the blue come from, and where did the gray go, and what happened to getting rid of the piss-yellow/green? Fugly ships are still fugly. http://img178.imageshack.us/my.php?image=smscreen021.png Penisbrick. http://img178.imageshack.us/my.php?image=smscreen022.png Ugly as hell, though t...

deathbal101 wrote:Fuck it. no more ships from me.

My respect for you as an improving shipbuilder has just been shot to hell with this one sentence. Good job.

Meh, the beamcannon is nice, but the outside of the cannon itself looks flimsy, spammy, and generally unattractive.

I circled the part i mentioned in red, and the stuff circled in blue is cluttery as hell.

That was referring to a ship that came before the one i was talking about. Usually, if you're making a new ship, it means the ones before it can be edited, but are otherwise finished.


(At least, in my case)

Epic fail edit.

o___o

This new ship comes with:

Weapons spam.
Clutter.

And a bad case of BSU, or:
Bad Section Usage.

The ship that came before looks like a stationary beamcannon, but it's still quite cluttery and uncolored.

Nutcase wrote:Reminds me of those ancient ships that were built when there were only stock sections available.
I don't think that's a good thing.

Indeed. I think it has something to do with the repetition/section size.

Your new ships are much better although some engines would look rly good. maybe some of the curved alien 100s If you look really closely, the Bomber and LAF have engines. \o/ (ThrusterEX's, but the Bomber's is alpha'd.) one 5 section ship+same ship with sections spammed= how much useful criticism d...

Fuck you then you half bit tard! Its not like i said it just sucks. I said the two are virtually identical, and then I know you can do better than that. Saying one nice thing about your dumb ass is pretty damn unique on this forum! Besides, last time I tried to use them, mini missles were bugged so...

the huge blue piece out in front has an appalling lack of detailing. Add something on it to give it more detail and, by result, more depth. :| Adding another piece on top of it results in a massive case of the uglies. If i proceed with that, it won't look how i want it to look. That being said, I l...

Now that i have been gone for a while, it's time for more ships. Being part of a new star-nation. The Defenders Of The Impenetrable Fortress-World Of Tygar Or DIFWT for short. http://i115.photobucket.com/albums/n297/omgsand/SMscreen00-7.png Tygarian Fighter Pod The most basic of tygarian ships, thes...

Edit: What the hell? Why is the bb code completely disabled? Mod Edit: Because you're a moron and the http:// part is mandatory, perhaps? - Arc. Edit Reply: So I'm mentally challenged for not realizing that this forum, unlike most all of the others I use (or manage), requires the "http://"...