The Royal Aralonian Navy - Fleet Distributions

Post by **Aralonia** » Fri Dec 21, 2007 6:00 pm

The Modern Royal Aralonian Navy – Fleet Divisions

==1st Fleet, Home Defence Force

--Supercapital vessels
MCH-09 Horatio Nelson (Nelson-A)

--Monitor-type vessels
MCI-01 Otto Leopold von Bismarck (Bismarck-A)
MCI-04 Winston Leonard Churchill (Bismarck-A)
MCE-17 Helmuth Bernhard von Moltke (Bismarck-C)

--Cruiser-type vessels
(niche use for drake/eugen hulls – probably 6:4)
(many Thunderer cruisers to act as patrol ships, 6:4:3 ratio Thunderers to Sentinels to Endurances – probably those values x 4 (24 + 16 + 12))

--Destroyer-type vessels
(LOTS of mothballed Scharnhorst DE – on the order of 100? rear line duty, probably mold 1st and 5th fleets together)

==2nd Fleet, Heavy Assault Force (East)

--Supercapital vessels
MCH-11 Baron Cuthbert Collingwood (sunk during attempted defection) (Nelson-A)
MCH-19 Regent Aleksandra Gorbachova (Elson)

--Monitor-type vessels
MCI-02 Hermann Wilhelm Goering (Bismarck-A)
MCE-07 Ludwig Von der Tann (Bismarck-C)
MCI-10 Friedrich Wilhelm von Seydlitz (sunk during scouting run) (Bismarck-A)
MCE-13 August Karl von Goeben (Bismarck-C)
MCR-22 Georg von Derfflinger (Bismarck-D)

--Cruiser-type vessels

==3rd Fleet, Expeditionary Force [180]

--Monitor-type vessels [4]
MCI-03 Charles Andre Joseph de Gaulle (Bismarck-B)
MCE-06 Ferdinand Foch (Bismarck-C)
MCE-12 Georges Benjamin Clemenceau (Bismarck-C)
MCI-21 Principe di Cremonia (Bismarck-B)

--Cruiser-type vessels [12/68]
-8 Prinz Eugen CAI
-4 Drake CAE
-24 Thunderer CSC
-20 Sentinel CSE
-24 Endurance CKI

--Destroyer-type vessels [96]
-58 Dusseldorf DR
-38 Westfalen DI

==4th Fleet, Heavy Assault Force (West)

--Supercapital vessels
MCH-14 Viscount Samuel Hood (Nelson-B)
MCH-16 Norien Moreni Elson (Elson)

--Monitor-type vessels
MCI-05 Baron George Anson (Bismarck-A)
MCI-08 Baron George Brydges Rodney (Bismarck-A)
MCE-15 Earl Richard Howe (Bismarck-C)
MCE-18 Black Prince (Bismarck-C)
MCI-20 Duke of Saris (Bismarck-B)

5th Fleet, Colonial Defence Force
[unfinished]

6th Fleet, Carrier Strike Force
[unfinished – expect 6 Bismarck hulls as carriers)

7th Fleet, Support Force
[unfinished]

Normandy · Post by **Normandy** » Sat Dec 22, 2007 3:34 am

Man.

You really like your fleet don't you?

Lizzie · Post by **Lizzie** » Sat Dec 22, 2007 4:30 am

He must REALLY love his Bismarck class, I swear that word STILL is ringing through my head.

Post by **Aralonia** » Sat Dec 22, 2007 5:57 am

-B variant of the Bismarck class is for frontal attacks and more of an 'assault' than 'lineship' configuration.

-C variant is an escort class, with lots of shorter range weaponry to take down stragglers.

-D variant is a missile-armed class with craploads of saturation-fire nuclear warheads and the like.

goduranus · Post by **goduranus** » Sat Dec 22, 2007 6:55 am

thread locked, no war

edit: Do your standard fleet come with carriers? their demeter modules reloads kinda fast. And what's the ratio of standard ships vs refit ships?

more edit: I think for the broadside version of your ships, maybe spread the deflectors out in centerline rather than all at the back. Sometimes the rear end get bombed and you lose all the shields.

Post by **Aralonia** » Sat Dec 22, 2007 7:59 am

goduranus wrote:thread locked, no war

edit: Do your standard fleet come with carriers? their demeter modules reloads kinda fast. And what's the ratio of standard ships vs refit ships?

more edit: I think for the broadside version of your ships, maybe spread the deflectors out in centerline rather than all at the back. Sometimes the rear end get bombed and you lose all the shields.

Standard fleets do not operate with carriers because they're still considered as experimental weapons. (shot down too easily) And I'm going to fix that in the final updates.

Broadside vessels are designed to have that deficiency.

TheBlueEcho · Post by **TheBlueEcho** » Sat Dec 22, 2007 10:00 am

"Bismarck" Fan?

Post by **Aralonia** » Sat Dec 22, 2007 10:26 am

...Is it really that clouded?

The reason I use 'Bismarck' EVERYWHERE is to designate the type of ship the named vessel is. It's a CLASS NAME. Would you be calling me obsessed with an amazing destroyer captain if I named my ships

Hopper (Burke-I)
Ross (Burke-I)
Mahan (Burke-II)
Decatur (Burke-II)
[skip a few]
Porter (Burke-II)
Oscar Austin (Burke-IIA 5"/L54)
Roosevelt (Burke-IIA 5"/L54)
Winston S. Churchill (Burke-IIA 5"/L62)
Lassen (Burke-IIA 5"/L62)

>_>;

Mjolnir · Post by **Mjolnir** » Sat Dec 22, 2007 4:52 pm

warhammer651 · Post by **warhammer651** » Wed Dec 26, 2007 4:43 am

despite the fact the the german battle ship bismark in WWII was the coolest battleship, you shouldn't keep repeating it

it's called originality

Post by **Arcalane** » Wed Dec 26, 2007 4:50 am

Perhaps you should read a post a little way up. But here it is again for clarity;

The reason I use 'Bismarck' EVERYWHERE is to designate the type of ship the named vessel is. It's a CLASS NAME.

Post by **Aralonia** » Wed Dec 26, 2007 1:38 pm

My 'originality' is present in the individual naming of each ship in the fleet of that class, even organised so that each individual fleet subsection is named to an entire nationality of former naval hero.

Yeah. Right. Need more originality.

Also, if you'd payed attention, you could see that it's a class name, like Arcalane said.

It's called 'reading comprehension'.